|Back to Common Law Index||
Luck On Your Back
What is a chieftain?
He or she is the person who can and will take the luck of their
people on their back.
The Law serves the Folk.
The chieftain serves the law. The
luck of the Folk is thereby served.
Today we have many names,
from many sources and points of view, for the indispensable station of
chieftain: goði, gyðja, harugari (if I understand the word properly), drighten and
drottning, and other terms from ancient or “foreign” tongues; and still
more interchangeable terms from Standard English, including the misleading
appellation “priest/priestess”. (I
regard this last term as inappropriate inasmuch as it expresses one function
of leadership – spiritual guidance and/or spiritual intercession – but
not the broader function of leadership.)
Preferring words in common
usage, understandable by non-Vinnish people, I tend to use the word
“chieftain” as a gender-neutral, more tribal term for the station of
leader amongst the Folk, and will continue to use it here to describe the
social station discussed here.
Likewise, I tend to use the
word “luck” where others might use “wyrd” and örlög, sometimes
interchangeably, or even “karma” or “fate”.
This is because this word, taken to mean “random good or bad
fortune”, often thought to mean “unearned good or bad fortune” over
which we have little control. It
is a word with roots as ancient as the untranslated words often used today,
and refers to the same quality: fortune,
one’s lot, and an influence on what happens.
If one considers the gambler, inventing “systems” and dodges to
“help his luck along”, drawing a card giving him good or bad fortune
both by virtue of his system; and by virtue of things totally beyond his
control – the “luck of the draw” or “the unseen hand” – one
comes closer to my meaning of the word luck as it expresses itself in ones
The chieftain is not the
system, nor is he or she “the unseen hand” dealing out the cards.
The chieftain is the custodian of the luck of his or her people, of
that spiritual and temporal force which proceeds from the actions of the
Folk, both together and individually, predisposing them to their lot and
dispensing the “judgment of random fortune”.
He aids in both working the “system”, then, as well as in guiding
“the unseen hand”. In order
to be a proper steward of his people’s luck, he or she takes his or her
people onto his back.
Today we have many
attitudes and views on the station of chieftain, not all of them positive.
The negative attached to the station has often been the result of
personal flaws on the part of those taking up the position, from arrogance
to inexperience to complete unsuitability as a human being; or the result of
reactions to the leader by those for whom the leader was responsible and
actions by those people in and out of the chieftains sphere of influence; or
even the actions, stated opinions and undermining of people completely
outside the leader’s experience or control.
People sometimes resist leadership, seeing leadership as “bein’
the boss o’ me”.
leadership itself, is as necessary to the forward progress of our people as
is the recognition that we ARE a people, a distinct people,
and that the Æsir and Vanir are the Gods of our people.
History and Lore are full
of excellent examples of chieftainship, sacral kingship, and the place of
leaders in the fortunes of their people.
We are treated to stories of good kings bringing good harvests, and
bad kings, jarls or chieftains bringing ill fortune to their people.
There are stories of kings being offered as blood sacrifice to
expiate the ill fortune of those for whom they’ve been responsible.
Leadership, then, was seen not only as an office of direction – do this, don’t do that, put the sofa over there, and paint the meadhall this, not that, shade of blue – as it was in times of war (either by choice or by circumstance), with the chieftain at the apex of the shield wall. It was more frequently an office of responsibility without much power, it’s duties executed by suggestion, admonition and example, rather than by force.
The chieftain was, as Dr.
Byock relates, in his excellent history Viking Age Iceland, a force
for order and especially for peace. In
an isolated island culture, with limited resources, often tending to deadly
combat for things as odd to relate to today’s heathen as the carcasses of
dead, beached whales, a peacemaker was a precious commodity.
The chieftain had secular
duties – advocacy at the Thing, for example – as well as spiritual or
communal religious duties, although some such as the hofgoðar had a more
limited “brief”. This is a responsibility carried over, in Iceland, from the heathen to the
Christian eras, with both Snorri goði and (under duress) Eirik rauða
building and maintaining chapels.
Finally, the chieftain was
respected to be a source of advice. Wisdom,
as evidenced throughout Lore, was as precious a commodity as was a calm,
level head. I’m sure that
wisdom had it’s elements of “knowing that which isn’t seen”, but I
personally have encountered few instances in Lore of vitki or seiðkonar
being consulted beyond the limits of their areas of expertise.
A chieftain, on the other hand, was an advisor, advocate, and stood
as supporter in things ranging from rights in fishing disputes, land issues
and marital arrangements. Wisdom,
in my opinion, was a knowledge of people.
So, apart from being
“handy”, why is the chieftain today so necessary?
It is because the
chieftain, taking as example (but not as a straitjacket) the actions of
chieftains past – both ancient and modern – should be expected to act as
agents of the law, and therefore as agents of order.
They should act in ways suggesting and promoting peace and guiding
their people toward success, not merely gratification.
As in ancient and more modern times, they should be expected to be
repositories of tradition, both in Lore and in form, in matters of communal
worship and observance. They
should be the signposts of their people, and not their masters.
They are important because
the actions of a people, as the actions of an individual, are the measure of
their worth, just as the fruits of those actions can be taken as the measure
of their luck. No matter how
smart or energetic, a worthless person – duplicitous, lying, venal,
fractious – should be expected to harvest his share of ill-fortune.
Going back to the example of the gambler, he may have a splendid
“system” which will serve him well, but he will one day encounter the
wrath of the intangible…if the traditions of our Folkway relating to the
existence of the Wyrd Sisters are the least bit true.
By the same token, a people
can be persuaded to act in ways which “muddy up” their reputations and
self-image, thus effecting their luck.
We need not consider the actions of the German people acquiescing to
the lure of National Socialism and racial purity for an example, but can
look to the actions of more modern heathen kindreds and voluntary religious
associations. People, kindreds,
periodicals, and associations have come and gone with amazing rapidity in
the last thirty years of revived Germanic heathenism, owing many will admit
to bad planning, bad advice, personality clashes…and, I submit, to simple
I further submit that
we’ve seen some associations have lasted a generation and are still going,
often with the same leadership, prospering at their own pace.
The Ásatrú Alliance is preparing to hold it’s twenty-third
Althing of the modern era, taking the trust over from the old Ásatrú Free
Assembly early on. These draw
less attention than some of the more entertaining and spectacular failures,
but stand as equally telling examples.
Many of the failures can be
attributed to bad, ignored or absent chieftainship; and certainly all of the
successes can be attributed to the custodial successes of the chieftains
involved, acting to advise, guide, and act for the good of their folk.
When chieftainship works
best is when the chieftain recognizes that the luck of his folk depends on
its having a good custodian. It
is when that chieftain is willing to step up from his or her own life, both
social and spiritual, and take not only his or her own actions as his or her
handiwork, but to take the actions of his or her folk as a personal charge
It is recognizing that we
are responsible for our individual actions, and that a people are
responsible for their collective actions, and that actions have
consequences, both immediately and concretely as well as spiritually and
abstractly. The chieftain is
simply the first one to stand up, sometimes the only one, willing to take
the full brunt of fortune, knowing that it was his or her own advice or lack
of advice, or leadership or it’s lack, as much as the actions of those for
whom he or she is responsible, which has brought the fortune to their
doorstep. If, as some believe,
luck is earned, the wise chieftain guides his people to earning the best
luck they can achieve.
This is “taking the luck of one’s people on your back”. It is a holy thing.